Comments: view entire thread

 

The Toledo 1951 side-by-side with the Toledo 1952

 
 By: WHL : August 31st, 2014-20:18
I have recently taken a shine to the Historiques Toledo 1951, dedicating a full review to it and stating that it has leap-frogged the Historiques American 1921 as my favorite watch in the Historiques collection. In private conversations with some forum me...  

both are atractive

 
 By: watercolors : September 1st, 2014-02:09
and If I could I would keep both of them , but If I had to choose I would go with 1951.In this case (a square watch), its thinness is in my oppinion an asset ! as well as the simplicity of a dial. looks more noble. Not to take away from the compilations o... 

1952 for me ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : September 1st, 2014-02:44
because to me it offers more charming details. Just for the pleasure of looking ... ... a lovely vintage piece that I had the pleasure to see at a VC collectors dinner some time ago. ...  

more "cioccolatone" in 1952

 
 By: patrickh : September 1st, 2014-02:47
for those who like cacao ;-)) Both are nice. Maybe 1952 for men and 1951 for women a perfect duo. Thanks for this side-by-side presentation. Cheers, Patrickh

Great comparison Bill!

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : September 2nd, 2014-00:06
I love the case design of the Toledos and in PG, they are just warm and awesome to me. They wear a little big for my small wrist but I can appreciate the feeling of them on my wrist. Both are beautifully crafted - case, dial. Between the two, purely on lo... 

Is that my watch and sweat stains

 
 By: docsnov : September 3rd, 2014-01:44
on the inside the 1952 strap? :-) Stewart