respo
4777
You're right!
Jun 04, 2012,21:08 PM
You said it perfectly. No bad choice between these two. And it is really nice to see these two side-by-side like this for comparison. Some minor and major differences that add up to two very different watches, IMO.
I made up my mind last year, and I think we are not on the same page with regard to this one. But at least we are reading from the same book!
I love both of these, as you know. One cannot go wrong either way.
Best,
respo
This message has been edited by respo on 2012-06-04 21:35:41
Comments:
view entire thread
You're right!
By: respo : June 4th, 2012-21:08
You said it perfectly. No bad choice between these two. And it is really nice to see these two side-by-side like this for comparison. Some minor and major differences that add up to two very different watches, IMO. I made up my mind last year, and I think...
Both look great,
By: docsnov : June 5th, 2012-21:54
but for me I think the dial on the right is better looking. I like the red hands and stitching on the American, but not the tachymeter so much. I love the other's hour indices with the more simple seconds track for the chronograph. The American Overseas f...
I think the
By: hewitgar : June 10th, 2012-02:45
Std watch is better looking... But I like the xclusivit of the American. I'd steer to the right.... G
Imagine my surprise....
By: WHL : June 11th, 2012-08:25
when I saw this limited edition Overseas sitting at the NY boutique when I visited last week! A retailer that VC had recently closed had one that they couldn't sell and so VC purchased it back and has now put it up for sale at the NY Boutique. At the orig...